Hey this is Lee from AudaciousRC, and I wanted to share the results of some strength testing we did on foam wing sections, and perhaps make you better informed about the effectiveness of wing strengthening methods.
Introduction
Here at AudaciousRC, we love making our builds strong, and coming up with new ways to make them more durable and crash-proof. In our learning, we've discovered a few methods that are simple and effective, which we've shared in past articles. However, we wanted to know just how effective these techniques were, and were they worth the weight that they added? So we devised a way to test them. Yep, that's right, we did a little bit of science. We came up with a device that would slam a section of a wing into a metal pole, recorded the results, and came up with some conclusions.
Methods
Slamming Device, "Plane Guillotine"
After a bit of brainstorming and designing, Trent put together a nice rig using a bunch of wood, clamps, rubber bands, and a metal pole.
The rig had a footprint of about 2 feet by 2 feet, and used 2"x3" and 2"x2" pieces of wood, a simple metal hinge, and some rubber bands. We drilled a hole in the arm so we could insert the wooden spar into it, providing a firm hold for the wing. Each wing had to be glued to the spar for testing, and we placed the wooden spar behind the foam spar, so the forces could be distributed evenly across the section. The rig is very simple and easy to build, and doesn't use a whole lot of material.
Wing Construction
The wing sections were all made with the same dimensions. The wing had a 10" chord, with a 1" spar placed 2" back from the leading edge, and two folds were made into the top of the wing for curvature. They all used a relatively equal amount of glue, and each step was completed on all of the wings at once to ensure that they were all of equal strength to begin with. After cutting and gluing, each wing was put together using different methods.
Wing 1: Basic foam wing, no additional modifications
Wing 2: 1/8" wooden dowel placed in leading edge before wing was folded over
Wing 3: Covered with wing tape
Wing 4: Leading edge covered with gorilla tape (thicker and stronger than duct tape)
Wing 5: Leading edge filled with expanding insulation foam (the brand we used was called Great Stuff)
Wing 6: Insulation foam, wooden dowel, gorilla tape, and wing tape over that. Basically everything all at once.
Testing
Each wing was placed into the slamming device, pulled back to the full extent, and then released. This was repeated again to simulate a more powerful crash, and to get us better results on the stronger sections. The tests were filmed at 120fps and 240fps using GoPro Hero 3+ and Hero 4 cameras. We then took pictures of the wings after testing.
Results
Wing 1
Weight: 48.9g
After two strikes, you can see how the rod ripped right through the wing unobstructed. Without any support, the paper rips and the foam gets smashed in.
Wing 2
Weight: 50.1g
The wing with the dowel inserted into the leading edge fared much better. The dowel was able to disperse the forces across a larger area of the wing, you can see how the deformation is much wider on this wing than the first. After two strikes, however, the dowel snapped and the paper ripped a little bit. The foam has only crumpled a small amount inward.
Wing 3
Weight: 54.9g
The results from the wing-tape section were rather interesting. You can see how the tear is very clean and straight, as though it held on until reaching a break point (I'm pretty sure there's a physics term for this, something like Young's Modulus or Shear Modulus). The point is, the wing tape is like a tough skin, resisting rips and tears, and snapping after a certain amount of force is applied.
Wing 4
Weight: 56.7g
The wing with Gorilla Tape applied to it has very little to show after two tests. As you can see from the video, the wing bounces a lot more than all of the rest. This is probably a result of the rubbery nature of the tape itself. However it adds a little over 7 grams of weight for a 10 inch section, while the previous methods only add between 2 and 5.
Wing 5
Weight: 65.0g
This wing was filled with expanding insulation foam in front of the foam spar. The brand we used was called Great Stuff, and we've used it on many planes. The results of this test, however, were quite different than what we expected. The wing crumpled quite a bit, and caused the paper to rip. This is possibly caused by the fact that the expanding foam may not have penetrated all the way into the edge. As you can see in the video, the first impact created most of the damage, and when the bar reached the foam on the second impact, the deformation increased very little. The addition of foam, although it may not increase direct impact strength, it does increase lateral as well as torsional strength.
Wing 6
Weight: 78.8g
For this section, we combined all of the above methods into one wing. This wing was by far the strongest and heaviest. You can't even see any amount of deformation, crumpling, or tearing. However, the modifications create a 60% increase in weight.
Conclusions
Trent's Advice
Trent likes the results of wing #4, the one with Gorilla Tape on the leading edge. It has a lot of bounce, and holds the paper together well. He believes that the weight added by the Gorilla Tape is worth the extra strength.
Lee's Advice
I was very impressed with the results of the dowel in the leading edge, as well as the wing tape. I would recommend a combination of these two methods. The advantage of doing this is that the dowel in the leading edge does a good job of distributing forces across the wing section, preventing deformations, and is also extremely lightweight. Installing it is also fairly straightforward: before you fold the wing over, simply lay the dowel into the crease, put down some hot glue, and fold it over. I also recommend using the wing tape to cover the entire wing, as the tape gives it a tough skin that is waterproof and provides strength against tearing or ripping. A combination of these two methods will result in a strong and very lightweight wing.
Colton's Advice
Colton agrees with Trent's conclusion, but would also add the wing tape to the entire section. The bounciness of the Gorilla tape helps a lot, and if there is deformation, you can easily squish the edge back in place.
Final Words
Well that was a really long article. I hope you enjoyed it, and perhaps learned a few things. Please comment below what your thoughts are about our methods, our results, and our conclusions, and any methods you use to strengthen YOUR wings!
Thanks!
Lee from AudaciousRC
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
-Colton
Log In to reply
kind regards
Ross
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
-Trent ^
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
1. I was expecting an article on lateral wing strength - resistance to in-flight collapse, but I'll admit you gave us exactly what you put in the header, so ignore that comment. :)
2. I feel that over-strengthening is sometimes a BAD thing.
In the same way that car design has gone from the point where cars in the 40's and 50's were big and solid (the shell survived, but the passengers were killed), to the current situation where cars crumple and absorb the energy of a collision (and the passengers survive).
OK there's no passengers in our planes, but there's a bunch of electronics that are way more expensive than a couple of sheets of foam board. It is a personal choice, but if it's that bad an impact I'd rather the wing crumpled and the electronics survived than the wing stopped dead (and remained intact) and the battery, motor, camera, etc. were torn from their mounts and continued merrily on their way into whatever solid surface they encounter next.
In saying that I do admit to using reinforced packing tape on the leading edge of my wings and I totally agree with your conclusions, tape really increases water resistance and longevity.
Another bonus, which probably just applies to us really ham-fisted builders, is that tape stops the wing leading edge from splitting open during the folding process if I've been over-enthusiastic with my leading-edge bevel cuts.
But as I said - a great investigation, well presented and with clear conclusions. Cheers, alibopo.
Log In to reply
You bring up some pretty valid points, and I do agree that in the event of a crash, it is more important to save the electronics than the wing. However, in our experience, the electronics have a high chance of flying out regardless of how strong or weak the wing is. With that in mind, I would rather reglue/remount the components than rebuild the wing. For example, when I crashed my Phoenix blunt nose model, the wing remained intact and the blunt nose section was torn up, with the camera and battery being thrown from the plane. The electronics were fine, and because only the center section was damaged, I didn't have to rebuild the wings, which saved me about 2-3 hours of labor. Again, as you said, it is a matter of personal preference. If you're flying with very expensive electronics/flight controllers/etc, I can see how you would want the wings to crumple instead. As we continue to build bigger and more complex planes, that's something we're going to have to consider. Thank you for your input, it has given me a lot to think about. Perhaps it might be good to do another trial testing the deceleration of wings of different strengths during a crash. Obviously you would want the deceleration to be as low as possible, and wing crumpling is an integral part of that. Anyway, I digress.
Thanks again and happy flying!
-Lee -
Log In to reply
http://flitetest.com/articles/super-strong-waterproof-foam-core.
http://flitetest.com/articles/balanced-pusher-wing.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply