This is the Blade 350QX from Horizon Hobby, weighs 680 grams and measures 465mm motor to motor.
The Blade 350QX Quadcopter features dynamic flight modes which offer a variety of flying experiences and includes a GoPro compatible camera mount for capturing aerial video.
The propellers are mounted on the motors using two hex screws instead of the normal collet style mounts.
The flight controller is an in house developed design based on Horizon's AS3X technology.
It has a GPS, barometer, 3 axis accelerometers and gyros and is capable of multiple different flight modes. It also has the Spectrum receiver built in to the board. Which is convenient but also means that you are locked into that system.
There are many flight modes:
Smart mode - GPS/Altitude Hold, SAFE Circle™ feature and Stick Relativity. Perfect for novice pilots.
Stability mode - Limited flight envelope, self-leveling and optional GPS Hold. Ideal for video capture.
Agility mode - Aerobatic performance with AS3X™ flight characteristics and unlimited flight envelope. For experienced pilots only.
Safe circle - Never worry about flying too close to yourself with this invisible pilot barrier (Smart Mode only).
Motors: Direct Drive Outrunners 1100kV
ESC’s: 10A
Battery: 3s 2200mAh
Flight time: 10-15 minutes
Flying Weight: 680g
Length: 465mm
Body: X-Quad
Props: 8" Proprietary
Flight controller: Integrated Proprietary - cannot adjust gains.
Price: 470$ Read to Fly
Available Packages: RTF, BNF
Camera: Optional
Thanks mainly to the stability mode, the 350QX is both fun and easy to fly FPV. The auto level and GPS lock takes away a lot of stress for just flying around FPV and it does invite to some fun flying.
Capturing aerial video is another thing though. The 350QX is capable of capturing good video, but it is harder and more work than other copters. This is mainly due to 3 things:
First being it’s small size, it can easily be buffered around by the wind.
Second, the proprietary propellers. They are pretty soft, which is good for durability but the flex can induce vibration. They are also more difficult that normal propellers to balance due to to the lack of a flush back and big enough steer hole for the cone of the balancer to guide against. All the shots in this video were made with how the props came from the factory and as you can see there are vibrations present.
Third and last, the lack of adjustable gains.
All of these things makes is difficult to get great shots. I’m not saying it’s impossible, I’m just saying that the conditions for getting those shots are more strict and therefore more rare.
Skill Level: Intermediate
Agility: 8
Power: 7
Speed: 6
Setup/Build: 8
Durability: 7
Ease of Repair: 1
Line of sight Flight Experience: 7
FPV Flight Experience: 5
Aerial video capability: 4
Includes: charger, transmitter, spare props, gopro mount
Cool features:
Safe circle flight mode
Extensive LED communication
Replacement body: 35$
Replacement props: 5.5$/pair
Log In to reply
Key strengths of the show:
1. Good pace. It keeps moving, never flags.
2. Lots of information. Good coverage.
3. Not just opinions, but reasoned conclusions so I can judge whether or not I agree.
4. Camera was in focus and the filming was smooth.
5. Entertaining, great flying footage to explain all the points.
6. Clear summary, showing which attributes you find to be important.
7. Honest scoring - no sense of attitude.
Thanks again - I would love to see this develop for other reviews.
Log In to reply
Thanks David
Log In to reply
I own a Blade 350QX and here's why I love it:
It gave me the fever!
My prior experience with helis and quads was frustrating. I'm a plane guy. So the poor Blade 180MQX that I bought, with no stability modes or any noob-friendly features, was maddening. Just could not fly that thing to save my life. I convinced myself that quads were not for me. Beyond my skill level. I'll stick to planes, thank you.
Then I read about the 350QX and it's training mode. So I bit the bullet and got one. It gave me the confidence that I needed. And I really loved flying that thing.
Since then, I got a NanoQX and am learning to fly it the old fashioned way. Beating the crap out of it. Just having fun. I am building up the confidence and skills to taking the larger 350QX up in the more advanced modes. But I want to nail down the basics of quad flight on that nano, get good, then take up the larger 350.
What's more, I'm eyeballing a Rotor Bones setup to build my own quad. Baby steps. Want to build up flight time and confidence.
So just like with planes, there's no shame in starting with a forgiving, noob-friendly trainer, then graduating up to something more advanced and pure. I see the 350QX as that introductory, stepping stone platform.
Bottom line for me -- a great entry into multirotors for a noob like me.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
If its gets a few position reports incorrectly it will think its somewhere else and head away. Same could happen if somethings wrong with the gyro or accelerometers.
Really wish flite test would do a bit broader testing. Im getting tired of seeing overpriced horizon hobby models.
I don't think they have ever mentioned manufactures like hubsan even once.
Hubsan has some pretty awesome micro fps stuff. Like the 6.5x6.5 cm 107d quad or their 80cm fpv spitfire/corsair.
The rtf quad is only ~150$ shipped from china.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
That being said, with the new formality, you guys did give up some of the laughs that usually come with a less serious review. This changes the game because I am no longer as entertained and no longer feel the need to watch videos I am not interested in. I used to look forward to what ever video was being posted because I knew even if I wasn't interested in the video it was usually good for a few laughs. This video felt like a chore to watch at parts because I am not as interested in quads (Yes, there is a small minority that is more interested in fixed wing and single blade copters).
This might just be me getting used to the new format though, and it looked like you guys only had one of these quads, you couldn't unleash the Bixler, Windestål combo on them. So maybe my gripes are with the product itself and not with the format.
Log In to reply
I loved the video, and the detailed explanations. I guess this is one way for FT to prepare for the plausible situation that he has to return back home (which probably will result in better deals for me, I'm just waiting…, greetings from Finland ). But I missed the three opinions, that usually is portrayed.
Why not when making such reviews, use this format for going trough the details, and features. When just one talks, it's more structured and more easy to follow, than when three dudes talks at the same time. But for wrap up when the opinions are given, bring it back into to the talk-show. This way you could maybe have a couple of reviews in one show.
Bring the good parts from both formats into one package.
Log In to reply
Any way that is actually how Top Gear does their show, the 3 guys usually have made their own videos in the show, that the 3 dudes in that show then discuss after they showed the videos.
That is the format you need to make. Basically exactly what I said above, but now you have a reference.
Log In to reply
That being said, I do agree with others that this is not always the format that should be followed. Things like the Ultra Micros are better displayed in a fun environment, and you have done that. However, the 350QX is more designed for individual experiences and I think this review format suited it better than a "lets get 4 of them and bang em around" style.
I appreciate that you are willing and able to try new things and this one was another success. Great cinematography.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Have a great one folks!
Frank
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Greetings, Max
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Keep up the good work.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Also, one thing that was omitted was that the start-up sequence can be glitchy. At least it was for me, that could be due to my inexperience. I love the smart mode though. It's almost fire and forget. I have a couple of small quads but this by far is the most fun, probably because it's big enough to cope outdoors with a slight wind and the multiple modes make it so easy to fly.
Keep on making great videos.
Log In to reply
As for my opinion on the product... If i HAVE to use Spektrum system to be able fly it, i am not buying it. :)
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
To echo many of the other comments, this was one of the most useable review to date. Tons of information, honest opinions, pros and cons. This is the kind of review I am looking for if I'm going to buy something ARF/RTF. The only thing missing is what made me a fan of Flite Test which is the way Josh, Josh and David compliment each other from technical knowledge to fying style and expertise. This ties right into the opinion caveat at the end.
Good work, looking forward to more of these.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
As far as the Blade QX350 goes, it is outside of my personal budget, no real chance of buying one or even a chance to fly one, so I was glad to get so much honest information on a very interesting product. All of the proprietary parts scare me, I like to tinker and this seems to be one way or no way. Nonadjustable software, fixed prop and battery selection, and one piece (expensive) body to replace have turned me off to this particular quad.
It is always good to hear honest reviews and well reasoned opinions from a reliable source.
See you guys at Joe Nall this year?
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply