Help Protect Our Hobby

by HywkFlyght | June 27, 2014 | (9) Posted in Tips

My fellow RC Enthusiasts,

Those of us residing in the United States received the following email today from the AMA outlining the FAA’s new interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft. If you haven’t read the Email, please read:

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AMA's Areas of Concern Regarding the FAA Interpretive Rule for Model Aircraft

On Tuesday, June 24th AMA issued a member alert expressing concern over some provisions in the FAA's interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft established by Congress in the FAA modernization and Reform Act of 2012. In that alert, we let members know that we would be following up with today's alert that explains AMA's concerns in greater detail. 

We need you to take action now and respond by July 25, 2014 to the FAA Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft that was released June 23, 2014. The Academy has reviewed the rule and is extremely disappointed and troubled be the approach the FAA has chosen to take in regards to this issue. FAA's Interpretive Rule

To help you respond to the FAA, we have outlined AMA's major concerns in the bullets below. A more in-depth explanation of our concerns can be found at AMA's Concerns

  • Throughout the rule the FAA takes great latitude in determining Congress' intentions and in placing tightly worded restrictions through its "plain-language" interpretation of the text.
  • The FAA uses the plain language doctrine to create a regulatory prohibition of the use of a specific type of technology.
  • FAA's overreaching interpretation of the language in the Public Law is evident in the rule's interpretation of the requirement that model aircraft be "flown strictly for hobby or recreational use."
  • Although the FAA acknowledges that manned aviation flights that are incidental to a business are not considered commercial under the regulations, the rule states that model aircraft flights flown incidental to a business are not hobby or recreation related.
  • The rule overlooks the law's clear intention to encompass the supporting aeromodeling industry under the provision of the Special Rule, "aircraft being developed as a model aircraft." The rule's strict interpretation of hobby versus business puts in question the activities of the principals and employees of the billion dollar industry that supplies and supports the hobby.
  • The Public Law states that when model aircraft are, "flown within 5 miles of an airport, the operator of the aircraft (must) provide(s) the airport operator and the airport air traffic control tower (when an air traffic facility is located at the airport) with prior notice of the operation. However the rule indicates that approval of the airport operator is required. Although it is understood that making notification to the airport and/or ATC will open a dialog as to whether the planned activity is safe to proceed, there is no intent in the law that this be a request for permission on the part of the model aircraft pilot.
  • The Interpretive Rule establishes new restrictions and prohibitions to which model aircraft have never been subject. This is counter to the Public Law which reads, "The Federal Aviation Administration may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft or an aircraft being developed as a model aircraft,..." if established criteria are met.
  • The Interpretive Rule attempts to negate the entire Public Law by stating, "Other rules in part 91, or other parts of the regulations, may apply to model aircraft operations, depending on the particular circumstances of the operation. This in and of itself makes model aircraft enthusiasts accountable to the entire litany of regulations found in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, something that was never intended by Congress and until now never required by the FAA.

How to Respond to the FAA.

All AMA members, family and friends need to take action now to let the FAA know that this rule significantly impacts the entire aeromodeling community and that this community is resolute and committed to protecting the hobby. 

There are four methods to submit a comment. Emailing your comment is the fastest and most convenient method. All comments must include the docket number FAA-2014-0396. Tips for submitting your comments.

Email: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.

Mail: Send Comments to Docket Operations, M-30; US Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

Hand Delivery: Take comments to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

DEADLINE TO COMMENT:  On or before July 25, 2014

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a very serious and urgent issue that needs to be handled now. Please, if you care about your hobby, send a brief message to the FAA. Even if you don’t live in the United States and the FAA has no impact over you, please, take five minutes of your time to help fellow enthusiasts. We all know why the FAA is wrong.

From a worried youth hoping to preserve the hobby.  

COMMENTS

1morehobby on July 5, 2014
Any operation not conducted strictly for hobby or recreation purposes could not be operated under the special rule for model aircraft. Clearly, commercial operations would not be hobby or recreation flights. 5 Likewise, flights that are in furtherance of a business, or incidental to a person’s business, would not be a hobby or recreation flight.

Goodbye Flitetest....
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 7, 2014
Truthfully the FAA probably has more to worry about then foam airplanes. I am just wondering why the FAA is choosing to pick on hobbyists. I never fly more then 200feet above the ground.
Log In to reply
1959cutter on July 7, 2014
the soviet union and US military call it "collective punishment"
punish everyone for the iresponsible actions of a few.typical government management practices.
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 7, 2014
government management usually does not bode well for the area it is trying to manage. In some it is a benefit, but but in this particular case no.
Log In to reply
Christian Jeppesen on July 8, 2014
Now hunting and RC FPV will be more alike, both need to hide with camo in the bushes XD. A sad time for our hobby.

Is there anything us euro guys can do to help?

Regards from Denmark.
Log In to reply
Yogenh on July 11, 2014
I know that I have been trying to do what I can. I just have a hard time putting it all into word. But I do try and hope that a lot of others try to do what than can. We all need to put in on this
Log In to reply
Desert.Rat on July 24, 2014
My comment to FAA

Dear FAA, over the last 3 years I have seen some amazing technologies being developed for the RC model aircraft industry. I have watched as the hobby has morphed from a stodgy, older, man dominated, and very exclusive and expensive hobby has opened up and become more inclusive because of new and exciting technologies. I am very against the FAA attempting to regulate a hobby with there over bearing rules designed for full size private and public aircraft. I understand the need for a centralized body of rules and regulations for an industry that move 10's of thousands of people each day and lives are at risk as they are transported into the upper atmosphere.

The model RC aircraft industry is a small and vibrant field where new ideas and designs can be tried and tested, with failures being a wrecked foam wing or a crumpled nose cone. No human life is endangered like it was in the early days of flight. My father is a private pilot and is now grounded due to medical conditions, but he can still walk to the park and launch his small foam plane in the air and pretend. With the new technology of First Person View or FPV he is able to feel the experience of being behind the controls again.

I also feel that regulating this industry with the bureaucracy of the FAA will stifle and eliminate the new ideas as creativity that is now growing. I have seen young people get off the couch and put down there video games and look for new ways to use the amazing and in expensive controller platforms. These are our future engineers and physics students.

I do understand that there must be rules that need to be followed for safety, both for the public and the RC pilot. I feel there are other bodies like the AMA and also local city councils. Just because these toys leave the ground does not mean they need to have FAA over site. If the FAA is worried about drones, then set a weight limit of 25lbs and not controlled actively within 2 miles of the transmitter is considered a device that needs extra over site and permits. I am concerned that putting a hobby under FAA jurisdiction will drive it all underground and you will now have kids doing more and more daring stunts. This technologies will not go away because the same technologies that are in my iPod are used for this hobby. What would our wold be like if government regulated the young men and also some women building those dangerous flying machines. Our whole way of life in the USA would be different. Would we even have gone to the moon? I'm sure there would have been other nations that would have encouraged creativity and set the worlds imagination afire. This is the case now. China and the European nations are moving ahead of us and more regulation will just stifle us.

Please reconsider your approach to this industry. We finally see our young people getting excited and creating, don't snuff that out.

Thank you for your consideration.
Log In to reply
1morehobby on July 5, 2014
Historically, the FAA has considered model aircraft to be aircraft that fall within the statutory and regulatory definitions of an aircraft, as they are contrivances or devices that are “invented, used, or designed to navigate, or fly in, the air.” See 49 USC 40102 and 14

Baseball, Frisbee, paper plane, golf ball, fishing lure, etc etc etc.
Log In to reply
Pukin_Dog on July 6, 2014
I feel that it will also impact other countries like mine (Sweden) since we often like to do what big US does. And it will also indirectly impact us since US is a big market and if they can't use some technology (FPV), then manufacturers would probably scale down investments in new tech in this field and that will make things troublesome for us to. So please all you fellow RC flying Americans, do write to them!
Log In to reply
BluBunnyRC on July 5, 2014
can someone dumb down what this rule means? (I'm a kid so that's why!) ;)
Log In to reply
Good Kebo on July 7, 2014
Here is a great explanation:

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SeuKQ63w5lk
Log In to reply
BluBunnyRC on July 8, 2014
thanks
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 5, 2014
A very simple translation: It will take some of the fun out of the hobby if we obey the FAA's new law. (to put it bluntly)
Log In to reply
Ano Pilot on July 10, 2014
It explicitly bans the pilot from flying by means of FPV goggles, and it implicitly bans the pilot from flying by means of a screen because it INSISTS on control by CONTINUOUS UNAIDED line of sight. FPV would be relegated to PASSENGERS ONLY and that would be the end of that.
Log In to reply
bitogre on July 7, 2014
Put simple, the FPV and all commercial activities may become illegal if we do not act. Many people are addressing because of FPV. But I think the banning of commercial activities is also an issue. Some such commercial activities that I feel need to remain legal are:

- R&D - The process of test flying a RC aircraft that you intend to sell will no longer be legal in the US. So, if this goes into effect, no more new Flite Test plane designs.

- Instruction - When I got into the hobby, I paid some one to teach me how to fly an RC plane. I found this instruction very helpful as none of my friend flew at the time. This activity would become illegal.

- Reviews - Reviewing model aircraft for money would also be covered. Any reviewer would have to do so for free. This would significantly limit the quality of reviews as most people do not have the time to do well produced reviews for free.

- Demonstrations - At most RC events, there are noontime Demonstrations put on by companies that want to sell us planes. These same companies also help pay for the event. If this interpretation goes into effect, these demonstrations would be deemed illegal. Some may think this would be a good thing (more time to fly) but it will also mean that there will be a shift in who is paying for the event (high event attendance fees are likely).
Log In to reply
canuck on July 5, 2014
I'm in Canada and this concerns me. Rulings like this tend to be far reaching, impacting many facets of the hobby. Everyone needs to be concerned.
Log In to reply
travdudemt on July 6, 2014
This also infringes on our unalienable rights stated in the Declaration of Independance ~"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

this is taking a big bite out of my pursuit of happiness

Log In to reply
1959cutter on July 7, 2014
as a pot smoker for the last 40 years it's just now becoming legal.
we as Americans need to assert our right the Persuit of happiness!
as Barry Goldwater said "your rights end at the tip of my nose!"....meaning,do what you want,just don't trample my freedoms.
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 7, 2014
Yup, the FAA can do what ever they want so long as it does not interfere with me or anyone else.
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 7, 2014
You have good point there.
Log In to reply
1959cutter on July 5, 2014
i think these people that fly FPV just need also to exercise their second amendment rights as well!
(what's the harm of a little hyperbole at this point?)
Log In to reply
Christopher14 on July 7, 2014
That had me chuckling for a good half hour :)
Log In to reply

You need to log-in to comment on articles.


Help Protect Our Hobby